Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Boutenko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Victoria Boutenko

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article is a BLP containing little except references to the subject's own books, her publisher's corporate website, and testimonials. (If improperly-cited BLP content were removed, there would be essentially no article.) No evidence of notability, either via WP:N (mentioned principally in a not-quite-independent blog printing interviews with her) or even WP:PROF. Article was created by user banned for sockpuppetry, whose actions appeared almost exclusively promotional in nature. TheFeds 04:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Chzz  ►  01:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as promotional bio. Most contributions made by single-purpose accounts that are now blocked. Most references are actually commercial websites promoting her book. The book seems to sell well according to Amazon, but it's unclear whether or not this will be a short-lived ephemeral piece. Seems like there should be some WP:RS out there and I'm glad to change positions if such are found. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2010 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.