Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Cooke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Victoria Cooke

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

After four years we have a one line uncited stub? Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Notability (people)  Off2riorob (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 21:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nomination. Reads like WP:SOAP. --Ktlynch (talk) 22:18, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I haven't found significant coverage of her.  Them From  Space  23:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. By longstanding precedent, Playmates of the Month are sufficiently notable.  Some may be candidates for merger and redirect, provided that can be done without loss of information. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Being Playmate of the Month is not notable. Fails GNG & PORNBIO. EuroPride (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies GNG in looking at Google News search. Several newspaper articles keep referring to her as playmate. Hence that is her notability, as a playmate. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment at Articles for deletion/Gillian Bonner and elsewhere--Milowent (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Morbidthoughts and results of Google News. Dismas |(talk) 14:07, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Hipocrite (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: You will see I just added a 1984 feature newspaper article profiling her exercise program she developed (and two other cites).  I used this crazy new tool called Google to find it.  New !voters please take note.--Milowent (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep   The achievement is documented,and that is all that is necessary. The consensus is as it has been before, and the attempt to change it inconspicuosly seems to be clearly rejected by the community as  a whole DGG ( talk ) 07:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.