Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Jancke (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Victoria Jancke
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

same as last time, she still doesn't meet inclusion criteria. There's no actual in depth coverage of her, just passing mentions and interviews (and black hat SEO trying to pass off promotional gibberish as journalism.) Praxidicae (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Inclined to say delete. Not sure how this person is supposed to meet WP:ENT if none of her filmography even has its own page. However, I would love to hear from a German-speaking editor before the process is over, both to verify the content and reliability of the sources and to say if this person might actually be relevant. To be continued, Harry  —  Say hello!  18:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 *  Speedy delete per G4. No substantial difference from the previous version as deleted following the first AFD.    SITH   (talk)   21:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Not G4. Firstly, as an admin, I can tell you that the version on Deletionpedia is not the most up-to-date version of the original deleted article—that has an additional paragraph. Secondly, the new version has much less verbiage overall, much less promotional wording, and new "Philanthropy" and "Filmography" sections. I don't see how the two can be called substantially identical. BethNaught (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , fair enough, I was unaware the Deletionpedia version was out of date. The notability issue identified before still isn't helped by the reduction in sources in the live version.  Either way, clearly G4 is ineligible so I've changed to a simple delete on the basis of lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.  Thanks,   SITH   (talk)   22:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep I'm leaning to keep...for their work as an actor no, but the work as a model possibly - I don't speak German, but there appear to be substantial articles written about this model, in the German press. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Changed my vote from above - there are sources not listed in the article, but it seems they are not great quality. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm from Germany but I have a Conflict of Interest, because I'm a big Fan of here. There is coverage about here in the German press for example: Bild, ,  - Hamburger Morgenpost  - Abendzeitung  - RTL  (...) you can also find more coverage with a simple Google News Search (language: German) --2A01:598:B90E:69A2:38D5:9D7E:8A94:866B (talk) 17:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The german sources are neither in depth nor reliable (and don't constitute anything close to being coverage in rs.) Praxidicae (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep in support of the research done by the IP poster above. Those sources appear quite reliable, and notability is not an issue to me either.--Concertmusic (talk) 22:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't believe you actually looked at them, as I noted, they aren't reliable and aren't coverage. There's a reason why they don't have wide use and aren't trusted sources. They're spam. Praxidicae (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - the sources provided by the IP do nothing for notability, as they are simply PR blurbs and an interview (which is a primary source - which can't go to notability). Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No proof of notability beyond slim promo-pieces noted above. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * DELETE: fails BASIC, NMODEL and NONENG The Ace in Spades (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC) — The Ace in Spades (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Waskerton (talk • contribs).


 * Delete per accurate description by nom and per everyone above. Unfortunately, at this time, she's still not notable. She doesn't have an article on dewiki either (which by the way, I find rather strange as they have articles on almost anything, whether it's notable or not, actually). GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 11:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google News does spit out quite a bit of German-language coverage, but it's all of the tabloid and gossip press variety ("Victoria Jancke poses nude", "Victoria Jancke breaks up with boyfriend", etc.). To the very limited extent that these sources appear reliable, they are not sufficiently in depth and to base an article on.  Sandstein   16:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.