Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Janushaita


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Victoria Janushaita

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Just one of the many soldiers (just because she was a woman, does not make her notable). No Google results either on the (distorted name) used for the article title, or the correct Lithuanian spelling Viktorija Janušaitė. The only thing could find was that she indeed work as stenographer. Original research on the "opening up the male preserve of a military career to women". Prod by user:Maranjosie removed by original author. Renata (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

A couple of tangential suggestions, and something the article's creator may enjoy assisting with: (1) he pointed out on my talk page that there were many articles on similarly non-notable soldiers. Obviously, volume of other non-notable subject articles isn't a reason to retain, but if he is correct, it may be worth having a cleanup to delete those, since they have clearly been misleading as to what is appropriate content, and (2) given his knowledge of this interesting area, he may find some scope to add content to subject related matter articles - for instance, women in the armed forces, Russian armed forces, etc. Helenabella   (Talk)  07:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete As Renata mentions, there are demonstrable problems with the notability of the subject. I appreciated the clear writing and broadly interesting subject area, and so had a look around for sources or evidence of notability myself to see if I could find a way to build up the article, but wasn't able to find anything.  (Disappointing, since the bulk of non-notable creations are I see tend to be poorly written, copy-pasted/stolen content - this was clearly in another class.)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:18, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unfortunately per nom. While interesting, the notability simply isn't there, and she fails WP:SOLDIER. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.