Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Park Harriers and Tower Hamlets Athletics Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Desertarun (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Victoria Park Harriers and Tower Hamlets Athletics Club

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unable to locate significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG. AusLondonder (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  04:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England. AusLondonder (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sport of athletics-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. We don't have remotely enough coverage here to meet NCORP. JoelleJay (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Strong keep, bar for coverage is clearly met with over 500 newspaper matches (see and ). The component club has existed since 1926 and is home to Olympians and World Championships medallists. Also, when nominating an article, please add relevant WikiProjects to the talk page so that it will be properly categorized by the WP:ARTICLEALERTS bot. --Habst (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm seeing a lot of trivial coverage and mentions in articles about related topics. Where is the significant coverage? AusLondonder (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The first match from the London Evening Standard is about a murder in a park this group runs in? Do you honestly think these kind of mentions establish notability per WP:ORGCRIT? AusLondonder (talk) 16:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @AusLondonder, some of the sources definitely establish WP:ORGCRIT. I agree that the London Evening Standard murder coverage isn't significant, but that still leaves over 499 matches to analyze. For example,  is more than a mention. Thanks, --Habst (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep article is less than a month old, needs improvement but meets WP:N Orange sticker (talk) 16:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.