Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Prentis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy hist merged to draft space by Deryck Chan. KTC (talk) 21:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Victoria Prentis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. the only claim to notability is political, and she fails WP:NPOL. This article is WP:TOOSOON if ever. By the way she was not the head of a government department, she lead the "justice and security team" at the Treasury's Solicitor's Department. --Bejnar (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NPOL with no objection to recreation if she is elected to Parliament or other high office. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Return to Draft. I created the article, but was not involved in its move to mainspace. In any event, this AfD is moot, as Prentis will be notable after tomorrow's election. Edwardx (talk) 12:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. This was perhaps premature but as a practical matter, her constituency has been "Conservative since 1922", so as EdwardX says, this will almost certainly become moot tomorrow. (fivethirtyeight.com is currently projecting her to win with 49.8% of the vote to Labour's 24.4%.) --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I moved the article as I was looking for information on Wikipedia on likely new MPs and found Edwardx's draft and thought it would be helpful for other users. I think this discussion is a pointless waste of everyone's time. Catchpole (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's pointless today, but within the span of this AfD it will become very obvious one way or the other. Opinions expressed before that vote is counted are unlikely to count for much in this !vote. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.