Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorian Fairies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 01:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Victorian Fairies
Not Noteworthy, a mere 17 google results, Amazon carries this book (ranked #424,415 in book section), however one of the user reviews is this exact article. Delete  Malo 07:59, 21 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, nn, isn't an Amazon.com review copyvio? Usrnme h8er 08:13, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * actually this article predates the supposed Amazon user review by about two months, but that just raises more questions as to it's true source. My guess is that it is not original to Amazon or WP.  Malo 08:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment I'm more than a little suspicious - as Malo says, this same review is on Amazon's site. The reviewer has a single title to his credit with a review that cries out "copywriter". I really would like to feel a little more confident about the source of this text. But it may be a moot point: its Amazon rank shows this to be an obscure title at best, and as a new title, cannot claim any notability. Denni &#9775; 02:31, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - obviously blurb from somewhere else. --MacRusgail 17:49, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.