Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorian Jazz Archive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 05:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Victorian Jazz Archive

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability. The references are blogspot, pages barely mentioning the archive, the organisation's own website... JamesBWatson (talk) 20:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep More independent and reliable sources with significant coverage are needed for me to give a solid "Keep." Per the article, it is an accredited museum which has won an award for its displays.There appears to be some coverage in "Currency companion to music and dance in Australia" with the search snippet saying "Victorian Music Library, a subscription library, contains the largest collection in Australia of scores and parts available for loan to the general public. The Victorian Jazz Archive has a substantial collection relating to Australian ..." There are some mentions at Google News archive:, . Threshold skimpy coverage. Edison (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * * WP:JAZZ notified. AllyD (talk) 20:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * keep Per above.Trongphu (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Fine work by Edison, but at the moment I'm uncertain as to whether it is enough to satisfy GNG.  On the fence; perhaps other finds will sway me.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Edison's research shows that it is possible to compile a decent article on the topic. We refer to the institution in multiple articles and an additional explanation is a good service to our readers. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.