Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorian Railways M class (diesel-hydraulic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, no valid deletion rationale, no delete votes, and the only complaint has been addressed after nomination. Non-admin closure. --Pgallert (talk) 21:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Victorian Railways M class (diesel-hydraulic)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article has hardly any information. sillybillypiggy 10:33, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A lack of length and information such as this makes an article a stub, which I have flagged it as.  It is not a deletion issue.  --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - a bad, poorly written and formatted article should never result in a deletion. There are enough WP:RS to note existence and hence ability to pass notability. Should have been tagged for formatting and sources, not deletion. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 12:31, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Falcon Darkstar Momot-- SPhilbrick  T  12:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per invalid nomination. DubZog (talk) 12:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.