Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorian Serrated Tussock Working Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Victorian Serrated Tussock Working Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable organisation, only reference is primary source from organisation itself and searches have not yielded significant coverage; also orphaned. Could possibly merge useful content to Nassella trichotoma, but a redirect wouldn't make sense. Jwoodger (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Of note, (but probably of no consequence) It appears the pages main contributor (before being wikified) was User:Dpiserratedtussock.


 * Delete - as per nom - no gnews hits - no evidence meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG Codf1977 (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A non-notable organization devoted to weed management. I'd vote for Victorian serrated tussock if I lived in Australia.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete—not notable.--Grahame (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's already one of the external links in the Nassella trichotoma article. Someone could profitably incorporate info from the website, but that is Somebody Else's Problem. StAnselm (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.