Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoriana (role-playing game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cubicle 7. Consensus here at present is that reliable sources that demonstrate a level of notability required to have it's own article may exist, but perhaps not as of yet, and not to the level required at the present time. So I'm recommending content be merged, however if the situation changes, this can always be revisited in future. (non-admin closure) Steven   Crossin  Help resolve disputes! 03:31, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Victoriana (role-playing game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a commercial product has one source. A standard BEFORE (JSTOR, newspapers.com, Google Books, Google News) fails to find any more WP:RS. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 16:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as there is a review in Black Gate (magazine) (as noted in this online table of contents) in addition to the cited source and will try to find more, otherwise merge to Cubicle 7. BOZ (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per BOZ. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge to Cubicle 7. I haven't access to the two sources so I am unable to assess them and I am unclear as whether the other commenters have access to the sources. A merge to preserve anything in the page that can be reliably sourced looks fine but I am currently unconvinced that a standalone page is merited. Just Chilling (talk) 22:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge - I cannot access the book referenced, but I believe this game needs additional sources to have its own page. ---  GingeBro  (talk • contribs) 02:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.