Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victorious Kidss Educares


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  06:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Victorious Kidss Educares

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable corporation. A speedy deletion tag was removed on the grounds that we can't speedy delete schools, but this is not a school, it's a private corporation. Corvus cornix talk  04:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC) --Irfan 29 (talk) 04:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This is a well known school in Pune, India. It has been recognised by PNYV.org the official project of UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, 2005-2014.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - contrary to the statement by the nominator, that "this is not a school, it's a private corporation", this is indeed a school. It is a not-for-profit organisation but that is quite normal for Indian schools. The page certainly needs much better sourcing but Indian schools traditionally have a poor Internet presence so, to avoid systemic bias, time should be given for local sources to be researched. At present it has primary and middle school streams but it is awaiting the evaluation to offer the IB Diploma Programme which it plans to introduce in June. At that point it will incorporate a high school. Our practice has been to keep planned high schools, that are due to open within 12 months, on the pragmatic grounds that, for example in this case, it is hardly sensible to delete the page in March only to recreate it in June. In the unlikely event that the school fails the IB appraisal then it can come back here but for now keeping is in order. TerriersFan (talk) 15:50, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - as an exception per Terrier's extraordinarily accurate rationale. But keep  also  on  watchlists. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.