Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Airlines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Victory Airlines
delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball mtz206 15:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Concur with nominator. Ruby 15:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 15:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete especially in the airline industry, this may never happen --rogerd 15:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 16:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - Latinus 19:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep- While not a notable airline (actually not an airline at all yet) we should wait out and see what happens to it. It could be turned into a self explanatory article about why some paper airlines never make it to their first flight -Antonio Senior Pilot for Fake Airlines (hwehe, appropiate nickname!!) Martin 1:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Stifle 00:11, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom incog 19:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.