Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Gin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep/merge adding merge tag for further consideration. W.marsh 04:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Victory Gin
Not notable outside of Nineteen Eighty-Four, and hardly notable within it either. Robin Johnson 10:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Slight merge and Redirect to Nineteen Eighty-Four. It was notable enough within it for me to recognize it by name :).  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-02-06 11:00Z 
 * I didn't recognize it, but, then, I haven't read Nineteen Eighty-Four in a couple o' years. Redirect to Nineteen Eighty-Four; I doubt there's much worth merging. Lord Bob 18:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per WP:FICT. Just redirect if there's nothing to merge. Does not contain enough info to warrant own entry. - Mgm|(talk) 22:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge - there's just not enough material about this beverage in the source material to expand it to a longer article. (Thus wrote Orwell: "It's uncreatively named booze. It tastes awful." Can't really make it much longer then, right?) Might warrant a mention in the main article. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to book article. Haikupoet 04:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep if stuff like this is going to be deleted then why do we have a fictional beverages catagory.--Pypex 15:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * To include articles about fictional beverages. That doesn't mean we should have articles about all fictional beverages, notable or not. Robin Johnson 16:32, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.