Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vida-Flo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:30, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Vida-Flo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient notability. Nearly all the references do not mention the company/product - they are about IV hydration in general. This article was rejected multiple times at Draft:Vida-Flo (IV hydration therapy) for lack of notability, but the article creator just bypassed the AFC process to create it in article space with the same content. Peacock (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 02:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. Just because there is lots of references, doesn’t mean its notable. None of the references mention the subject in their title. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 20:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)


 * This article is for an organization established in 2012. To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing in the Wikipedia rules against having a page for an organization. Notability has been shown by adding several reliable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedelmissiri (talk • contribs) 18:33, 11 August 2019 (UTC)  — Ahmedelmissiri (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Strike sock comment
 * Comment: Ahmedelmissiri has been indefinitely blocked for editing this AFD with sock accounts.  Peacock (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * 'Keep' Added 2 references with the Page's name in their title — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tackydoc (talk • contribs) 20:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)  — Tackydoc (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Strike Sock !vote
 * Comment: Tackydoc has been indefinitely blocked for editing this AFD with sock accounts.  Peacock (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lots of sources but nothing indicate to support the WP:NCORP of the subject. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.