Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidalenolone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Vidalenolone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All chemical compounds must meet the general notability guideline to be included in Wikipedia. This one does not. It does not appear in the chemical literature beyond the description of it being identified. A Google search turns up nothing more than routine/automated database listings. There is literally nothing more to be said about this chemical compound than what's written in this one sentence stub. We can say it has been identified and really nothing more. ChemNerd (talk) 11:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect, not notable for a standalone article but of encyclopedic interest for a list or inclusion in a parent article. Not a chemistry afficionado so will leave it to others to determine the merge into article or list, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know of any appropriate target for a merge and redirect. ChemNerd (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seems to have received no coverage in the 16 years since it was published. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. If you really want to merge the info somewhere, I guess you could add it to the somewhat bizarre List of compounds with carbon number 13? Other than that I can't find a suitable redirect target... Ajpolino (talk) 22:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.