Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viddyad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete non-notable promotion per unanimous consensus. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Viddyad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This page should be deleted because it seems to be an advertisement for a small and non notable company with pr type articles supporting it as a concept. It seems to have a very small number of employees and a very very small turnover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Financefactz (talk • contribs) 19:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:SIGCOV, WP:NCORP and related guidelines. In terms of SIGCOV, a WP:BEFORE search in the Irish newspapers of record return largely passing mentions. For example, of the 9 results in the Irish Times, only one example mentions the subject in anything other than a passing mention (and at that it's a "pen pic" of the CEO related to an award run/sponsored by the Irish Times; not independent coverage). And, of the 20 or so results in the Independent News & Media stable, only one is substantively about the subject company (and at that only the same kind of "press release as journalism" we see for any other startup funding round/efforts). Otherwise it's all trivial mentions where the company's name receives a passing mention in articles about other topics/awards/etc. Not in-depth coverage of which the subject is the primary topic. In terms of NCORP, it seems that the subject is a relatively small company (with perhaps between 3 and 30 employees?) which received the same type of limited coverage many tech startups receive in the early/funding/growth-spurt days. Nothing beyond WP:CORPDEPTH that would allow for much more than the "brief, incomplete stub about the organization" that we already have... Guliolopez (talk) 20:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not a notable company, fails WP:NCORP. Spleodrach (talk) 21:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I have just realized the page seems to have been created by their old digital marketing intern Tatiana Frantsuzenko and further cleansed by another digital marketing intern Aoife Hanlon who deleted the notices saying it was an advertisement. Financefactz (talk) 23:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORPJuggyevil (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the news sources are weak. Jaxarnolds (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.