Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Game Comparisons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:NOTWEBHOST, and additionally I would say it falls afoul of CSD G11 as it had no encyclopedic content, and was written as a review which by its nature is there to advise on purchasing. If not blatant, then I don't think anyone will mind a WP:IAR deletion.  Taelus  ( Talk ) 21:59, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Video Game Comparisons

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:N as this is an essay filled with original research based upon its creator's POV. The article was WP:PRODed which was removed along with the maintenance tags by the creator without improvement. --moreno oso (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - You are being extremely generous in your description. This amounts to nothing more than using Wikipedia as a blog. - OldManNeptune (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Doesn't appear to fall under any speedy criteria - maybe G2 test, or A10 if someone can find a similar article, pity. A BLATENTLY OBVIOUS WP:OR essay. WP:SNOW anyone? Ryan Norton 19:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Completely agreed, WP:SNOW certainly applies. As mentioned this article was WP:PROD, a process only stopped by the author.  Deletion of this article is entirely uncontroversial. - OldManNeptune (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - OR essay, wikipedia is not a webhost.  Mauler90  talk 20:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.