Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Game Void


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Video Game Void

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Attempt to coin a video game neologism. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 02:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per WP:NEO. There is nothing to establish notability and the references quoted in the bottom should really tell you all you need to know! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 03:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – definite protologism. Particularly damning is "References → (various player reports)". MuZemike 22:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 00:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)&
 * Speedy Delete: Fails WP:N, no verifiable reference given or found. I would alterntivly support a keep with
 * Delete, fails WP:N and WP:OR, and probably many more. --Taelus (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per all above. --Teancum (talk) 22:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.