Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Gamerz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Video Gamerz
This is non-notable even for two-episode Flash cartoons. There is absolutely nothing about this series that sets it apart from the thousands or hundreds of thousands of other marginalia online. --maru  (talk)  contribs 05:27, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, NN in any manner. -Goldom (t) (Review) 05:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I dont see why the page is any less valuable then half of the stuff in wikipedia. Many short series and flash cartoons and the like are listed here, and there's no real reason to delete them, they aren't biased or anything, and for anyone wanting more information about it, it's useful. BTW, its creator already has a fairly big fanbase on newgrounds and elsewhere. Falco1029 05:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * every article must stand on its own. It doesn't really matter what else is on wikipedia. We are talking about this right now. --Crossmr 05:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, but Im saying that if Wikipedia's standards allow those, they should allow this too --Falco1029 05:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, also, I like how your reason is because you don't see how it sets itself apart. That is purely opinion and a horrible reason for wanting something to be deleted Falco1029 05:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm a horrible person. --maru  (talk)  contribs 05:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete It's not notable by Wikipedia standards. That takes it out of the realms of opinion.  It should be noted that Falco1029 is the creator of the article. Danny Lilithborne 05:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If it ever establishes real notability, its welcome to comeback. --Crossmr 05:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * (on newgrounds) VG2 Got daily second place, all are voted above 3.4 with hundreds of votes, and mostly good reviews. It's about as notable as anything else around here....Falco1029 05:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, only brings up a few search results. Ckessler 06:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Even admits to WP:VANITY ~ trialsanderrors 06:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom - Motor (talk) 07:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Coredesat 12:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely non-notable. If this exact same animation was the work of anyone besides User:Falco1029, Falco wouldn't care if it was deleted. Let's just get this over with. -- Kicking222 12:29, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't make any of those. Those aren't my work, they're my brother's (and to a lesser extent, his friends'), and i happen to like them. Falco1029 05:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. --Starionwolf 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 01:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Voice of Treason 23:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.