Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video logging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Audiovisual archive. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Video logging

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Bereft of encylopedic content, while the term is cleary genuine it's also pretty self explanatory (that video logging is the logging of video, thank you wikipedia). Reads somewhere between a how to guide and veichle for spam. Article isn't serving any purpose not met by Digital asset management, Content management etc. -- D'n'B-t -- 09:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 10:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Television. -- D'n'B-t -- 09:23, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Kind of want to Keep just because Vlogging exists, can be called video logging as well, and this seems needed for distinguishment against that. Hyperbolick (talk) 09:44, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: My first thought was to redirect to "vlog", but that's a different concept. This is categorizing videos, which seems self-explanatory and not really needing an article. This is at best a DICDEF that's too long. Oaktree b (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Still think if this is deleted, “Video logging" redirects to “Vlog" Hyperbolick (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge and redirect to Audiovisual archive This seems like the proper place for an article to redirect to; though we certainly aren't logging physical tapes in plastic markers with magic marker regularly by any means, this fits right into the first half of creating an AV archive for sure, though most of it is probably automated these days.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Audiovisual archive. I like Nate's solution but I don't think there's any reason to merge this content, per nom's deletion rationale. -- asilvering (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.