Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video spokesperson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Video spokesperson

 * – (View AfD) (View log · AfD statistics)

I have the strong feeling that this topic fails the WP:GNG Polarpanda (talk) 21:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no reliable sources demonstrating any significant use of this term independent from "spokesperson"; frankly, there is nothing here not covered by Spokesperson and I can't see any reason to suggest merging or redirecting.  Accounting4Taste: talk 21:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, but also check edit history and note that original article was a WP:Coatrack for spam links for a certain company . Once the linkspam was reverted with warnings on WP:COI and WP:SPAM, the creator lost interest.  MuffledThud (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing I can find that would confer notability. It strikes me as a content fork for someone to include spam for their own ends.  I agree with Accounting4Taste, there is nothing here that merits its own article.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  22:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.