Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidugavia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Gondor. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Vidugavia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Another minor Lord of the Rings character. Ridernyc (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per non-notability. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to House of Anárion, Rhovanion, Valacar, Eldacar and Gondor, redirect to either Valacar (as father-in-law) or Eldacar (as grandfather). 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge to Gondor because it's part of Gondor's fictional history. As far as I know, most of the kings of Gondor themselves are planned to be merged by WP: RINGS anyway. I don't see why deletion is necessary when a redirect will do as fine and still allows the name to show up in categories (Category:Middle-earth Men). Uthanc (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Because it's non-notable, unreferenced and not likely to ever be a search term. Ridernyc (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's likely to be searched because it's Tolkien. Some will inevitably treat Wikipedia like a Tolkien encyclopedia site. I'm not saying we should keep every single scrap of info but there's a place for everything no matter how small. Uthanc (talk) 12:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * So we should add it to the countless Tolkien redirects that lead to articles that make 0 mention of the search term. There is nothing to merge or redirect here sorry. Ridernyc (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * redirect at least very named tolkien character, even in the backstory, should be included, at least as a redirect. There's no possible reason why a redirect would be harmful. it will help some people. Redirect are an easy compromise in situations like this; if the information is not in the suitable article already, add it--that makes it a merge, not a redirect.  DGG ( talk ) 21:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gondor. De728631 (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.