Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vienna In Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 04:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Vienna In Love

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable band, fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (collogue)  @ 18:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (remark)  @ 18:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Thanks, --ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 21:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - There have been a few improvements since the nomination was issued. Best to check some of the new citations - it might be enough to pass WP:NBAND. --Drm310 (talk) 21:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * * Comment Most of the "references" on the page link to announcements that the band is performing a concert, selling tickets, or other trivial mentions.  The best reference that I found is http://www.exitfest.org/en/stages/subastage/vienna-love this one, which might be enough.  This article also has some concerns with WP:COI brought up at User talk:VIL12345678.  Conservative approach would be to delete this page, wait for the band to establish more clearly defined notability, then have a page written by neutral party.  However, its a close call and probably reasonable to keep.  Gaff (talk) 22:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * * Comment The COI and username concerns have been dealt with on my user talk page and WP:UAA. Everyone's satisfied that the editor in question is unaffiliated. That aside, there is still the outstanding question of depth of coverage and whether it's enough. --Drm310 (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

VIL12345678 (talk) 12:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Hi Guys I am quite new to this, so bear with me please. There have been a number of recent improvements. I believe this article should be retained because of the following: According to WP:Band, in order for a band to pass they must meet at least one of the criteria. Having looked across a variety of sources, I’ve found that the band satisfies three of these (1,4, and 12). Please find these points as follows with their respective references: 1).The band Has been the subject of multiple published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self published, and are independent from the ensemble. This includes newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries:          4).The band has received non-trivial coverage independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country: a)EXIT Festival (Serbia), b)Arenal Sound Festival (Spain)  Both of these festivals are reliable sources, i.e. EXIT Festival was officially crowned as the ‘Best Major European Festival at the EU Festival Awards in 2014. It has also been awarded ‘Best Overseas Festival’ at the UK Festival Awards in 2007 and was ranked one of the 10 best major festivals at European Festivals Awards in the year 2009,2010,2011,and 2012. In 2013, EXIT and was awarded ‘Best Major Festival Award’ . Arenal Sound has been described as an 80,000 people capacity festival. It takes place on the beaches of Arenal Beach in Castellon, Spain.   . 12)The band has been a featured subject of substantial broadcast segment across national radio or TV network: I’ve managed to come across a host of other national television sources however I do not consider them reliable as they have been self published by the band and therefore not usable in the case of Wikipedia.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Relist rationale: No one has responded to yet. This is also the only "keep" argument. There have been commentators that have not voted. For these reasons, I have relisted this discussion a third time. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Eh. Arsenal Fest and EXIT Festival are big international festivals, so I suppose that points at a "documented international tour," which fulfills part of WP:MUSBIO #4 (Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.) Looks to me like the English coverage is trivial so far, though (this band needs to hire a better publicist). Unless better sources are found, I say Userfy or delete, and dust off/repost later this year if there's more coverage. (maybe I'm missing that some of the non-english sources are in reputable publications?) Earflaps (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.