Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viessmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Viessmann

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No secondary sources found, wp:de article appears to have the same issue with sourcing. Appears to fail WP:CORP in the English realm  spryde |  talk  16:20, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless citations from reliable sources are provided to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Daniel  04:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable, no assertion of notability, speedy candidate. Carlossuarez46 18:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.