Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vietnamese immigration to Mexico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Vietnamese immigration to Mexico

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The first AFD, Articles_for_deletion/Vietnamese_Immigration_to_Mexico, was closed as no consensus after only five days by a non-admin. Because nobody !voted in the discussion, I'm 90% sure that an admin would have left it open until the 7 days, and then either relist it or soft delete. The closing non-admin, User:Vaco98, is a relatively new user (much newer than the nominator of the original AfD) and may not have properly understood when non-admin AfD closure is appropriate. (Or I'm going crazy or something.) casualdejekyll (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Technically not eligible for soft deletion due to previous AfD under a slightly different title. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 04:27, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. casualdejekyll (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. casualdejekyll (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. casualdejekyll (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT at least, the sources are a mishmash violating WP:RS, nothing of this is worth retaining. Geschichte (talk) 08:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete or Rename to something like Vietnamese Mexicans that (hopefully) leads to a page along the lines of Vietnamese Australians.Gusfriend (talk) 07:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. Nothing of value in the article and no evidence of notability. I merged the LA Times source to Orange County, California, which was the only source or information of value. Suriname0 (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.