Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Deenanath Chauhan (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Vijay Deenanath Chauhan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence this fictional character passes WP:NFICTION/GNG. I did review both prior AfDs which cite the same sources, half of which have link rotted by now. The only one that seems to be in depth is the video clip form NDTV, but video sources are problematic in light of WP:PUBLISHED (it may be ok, but it is not the best). As I said, nothing else seems to be in-depth, all I see are mentions in passing. I wanted to rescue this myself and add a sentence or two of reception, but I simply couldn't find sources good enough for that. I'd be happy if we could rescue this, but right now I am afraid there are no sources for that. If you want to prove me wrong, please suggest what we can actually say about this character because just a list of WP:GOOGLEHIT mentions is not very helpful (as proved by the fact that two AFDs and several years have not resulted in anything here that goes beyond WP:PLOT/list of appearances in media). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete There are 5 sources present here. Of them one is blogspot.com another is bollywoodlife which is not considered as WP:RS per WP:ICTF. The other sources present in the article is not enough to pass the article WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Current sourcing is insufficient to satisfy WP:N. TTN (talk) 12:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.