Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Nayudu (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against redirect.  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 02:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Vijay Nayudu
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails NSPORTS and GNG due to lack of significant coverage. No SIGCOV sources were found during or after the previous AfD over a year ago, and NSPORTS now requires that such sources be present in the article. –dlthewave ☎ 13:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket,  and India. –dlthewave ☎ 13:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The previous AfD actually mentioned a reliable source with significant coverage, which has now been added to the article. StAnselm (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * One source does not equal WP:SIGCOV Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does - all those GNG criteria apply on an individual basis. That is, we talk about the reliability, etc. of individual sources. Now, it sounds like you're saying that it needs multiple sources to pass GNG, but I was actually referring to WP:NSPORT, where for certain sportspeople one reliable source with significant coverage added to the article indicates that other reliable sources may exist. StAnselm (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You know very well that NSPORT is subordinate to GNG and thus requires multiple sources. Meeting SPORTCRIT #5 is a rebuttable indication that further sources exist. JoelleJay (talk) 23:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion. The previous AFD closed saying that the subject likely passes GNG, was a unanimous Keep and that was in 2021. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - "multiple sources are generally expected" in WP:GNG, and I failed to find a suitable second piece of coverage that could be cited alongside the 2013 article. I'm watchlisting this in case a further good source is identified, or if someone makes a compelling argument that the Bhushan book is a reliable source. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I think with the sourcing that we've found, the player's career and the time of his career, there's enough for a weak keep here. I imagine given the time of his career and the number of games played would lead to offline or non-English language GNG passing sourcing, although it would be nice if we had found some more by now. Can't see a suitable redirect here though if one is required. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication has been given, in this discussion or from a search, that the subject passes WP:GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 * This is either a weak keep, with the sort of rationale that RF22 provides above, or a redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers where a note can be added to summarise his career or someone can turn the thing into a table as it looks like there are going to be a lot of non-English speaking redirects coming up. I'd be happy with a redirect to this article as it was his state team and CA identifies it as the only "main" FC team he played for and the majority of his appearances were for the side. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong keep extended career at top-flight domestic level Bumbubookworm (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * That doesn't mean anything...participation at the domestic level does not presume existence of SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 20:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, Article fails notability. Alex-h (talk) 12:19, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect or delete. A single source isn't sufficient for GNG, but redirecting might permit discovery of further sources. JoelleJay (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.