Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Ray-Chaudhuri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g1 patent nonsense, g3 vandalism. Come on, "Claymore Research Association of Pennsylvania (CRAP)"? "Franz Beckenbauer Institute"? NawlinWiki 16:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Vijay Ray-Chaudhuri

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete hoax article about a supposed Nobel Prize winner, was tagged speedy but despite much debate suspected or real hoaxes are not speedy candidates. Carlossuarez46 01:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - I nominated it for speedy deletion, apparently incorrectly. The creator (Phoenix74x) vandalized several other articles in a clear attempt to slip it past casual observers, despite the patent nonsense that it contains.  The subject is claimed to be a 2006 Nobel laureate in Medicine, however the Nobel Foundation's official list says otherwise.  Frankly, it's a shame that this article will last the 5 days this process requires.  RossPatterson 01:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 03:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per vandalism policy under WP:CSD. Given that we have the actual list of laureates from the Nobel foundation that confirms this is a hoax, can we just break out the WP:SNOW-shovel and delete? . -- B figura (talk) 03:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom hoax. Harlowraman 04:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant hoax. Agree there seem grounds for speedying under WP:CSD, which states blatant hoaxes can be speedied as vandalism. Espresso Addict 07:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Clearly false, so WP:IGNORE. Seth Bresnett • (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.