Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijayalakshmi Shibaroor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I’m not convinced we have an actual consensus… or the dragging this out to a month would help create one. Status quo ante, see if the article develops and renominate if necessary. Courcelles (talk) 13:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Vijayalakshmi Shibaroor

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable professional who does her job, fails WP:GNG. US-Verified (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 10:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep This article from the IFJ regarding her journalism suggests that this article needs substantial improvement MNewnham (talk) 02:52, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per reasoning by MNewnham. I originally was thinking of supporting a redirect, but the argument and source provided by MNewnham convinced me otherwise.Historyday01 (talk) 03:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep A source included in the article says that Between this and the attack against her described in the source linked by MNewnham, she seems notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmallJarsWithGreenLabels (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.