Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijoy S. Sahay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Arguments for deletion are clearly stronger. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Vijoy S. Sahay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor unrecognized research paper/work. Do we need individualistic approach for single low importance profile or event/s for each and every staff/professor of Indian University who does not even hold major academic work position. Drsharan (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Drsharan (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Drsharan (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Drsharan (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not each and every professor (as the individual claims to be) can get their article on Wikipedia. The individual fails WP:PROF, unless he had an outstanding work achievement (which impacted his scholarly discipline) or research work or awards. The individual did not even hold any major incumbent in Indian University system. Couldn't find any reliable source that supports this article independently. The work is not cited in leading journal or publications. Minor event/research work. It is somehow an example of self-promotion. Drsharan (talk) 06:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Drsharan has said all that needs to be said.--Rpclod (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * STRONGLY KEEP Very good article and research work. Rksinghrules (talk) 15:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC) — Rksinghrules (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * KEEP NOTABLE CULT OF PERSONALITY. Papasingh (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC) — Papasingh (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Please don't SHOUT, my ears... --Randykitty (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * LEAVE US AND THIS ARTICLE. PLEASE!!!! Rksinghrules (talk) 05:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:26, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails Notability (academics) test, the person may be published but it was not significant in his field. Frmorrison (talk) 03:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.