Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikash Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. Page creation for this article has been salted per repeated deleted versions at Vikash singh, Tiger saraf and User:Vikash9097 North America1000 17:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Vikash Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod removed-a autobio that does not reach notability yet. Wgolf (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Self-promotional page with no evidence of notability at all. In fact it might well have been speedily deleted under criterion CSD A7. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. No evidence of notability. No evidence of any Google hits at all other than this actor promoting himself in every possible venue. Salt because of the repeated attempts by this person to use Wikipedia to promote himself. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Would you clarify this? The logs show this article has not been deleted or restarted.
 * Try checking Vikash singh (lower case last name). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 01:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Also Tiger saraf and a user-space copy, which has now been deleted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Multiple searches found absolutely nothing for this actor despite using the TV shows and IMDb only lists an assistant editor with this name. SwisterTwister   talk  00:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * As a note I tried to put a not webhost on the users page but it kept on getting deleted. Wgolf (talk) 00:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete -- not notable. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt Not notable and never will be, unless they actually do something notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * According to User talk:Vikash9097, the user is a sockpuppet, and so this could also be deleted under G5. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's true. I suppose I could delete it for that reason, but having commented in this discussion, perhaps to avoid any doubt it's better if I don't. Another administrator could do it, but the article is no doubt going to be deleted anyway, and whether it's done speedily or after a few more days really makes very little difference. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.