Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikingvin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Vikingvin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In January 2013 User:Gongshow proposed this for deletion with the rationale "Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO; no significant coverage found in reliable sources; no charts or other criteria met.". The WP:PROD notice was removed without comment by an IP, but the article remains almost unchanged, minimally referenced, mainly to radio show playlists, with the best being a now-archived page on a terapija.net e-zine. I have interwikied the Slovenian Wikipedia article (as Aleksander Cepuš): a CV page which lists prolific activity and links, but I am not seeing reliable 3rd party sources which demonstrate the subject as meeting the notability criteria. I am therefore bringing this for wider discussion around the 2013 Prod rationale, as to whether the WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG criteria are met. AllyD (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence that subject meets WP:MUSICBIO or indeed WP:GNG. Precisely zero hits on a Google/GNews test. Looks like cross-wiki spam (with COI and SPA overtones) to me. Guliolopez (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.