Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikram Sakhalkar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closing as no consensus to delete. Article has been improved over initial nomination's version, and the keep !vote is persuasive as well. (non-admin closure) Sir Joseph (talk) 20:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Vikram Sakhalkar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Models and film actors are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for Wikipedia articles is determined by criteria at WP:ACTORBIO. I am not finding major roles in multiple films/tv shows therefore fails WP:ACTORBIO. Search doesn't produce any coverage and substantial information in the independent RS about the person either so fails to meet basic GNG.. Saqib (talk) 07:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I closed this as "delete", but was notified on my talk page that the article was edited to add sources just after the last "delete" opinion.
 * Delete fails WP:ACTORBIO.  FITINDIA   11:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:07, 4 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep enough reputed citations have been added, plus multiple notable film credits including lead roles easily satisfies NACTOR criteria of notability so keep it. I would recommend adding a stub tag so the article can be further expanded someday, but no point in deleting it. JayB91 (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 10:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.