Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikrmn (CA Vikram Verma)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Vikrmn (CA Vikram Verma)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two sources, neither of which contributes towards notability. Paradoctor (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Of the two sources currently included, only the newspaper article from 2010 helps establish a case for notability. In addition to the two sources in the article, I found a few press releases republished, but I don't see that there is sufficient coverage of this person in reliable sources. Notability has not been established according to either WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.