Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vilambit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being relisted, there is consensus against this being deleted. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Vilambit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N). Umair Aj (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Delete. It is not the question of some fundamental concept rather it should be according to (WP:N) and I can't find evidence that this topic has been discussed by reliable sources. Umair Aj (talk) 19:45, 31 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. This is a fundamental concept in Hindustani music, so we should have an article on it. --Deskford (talk) 08:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Umair Aj, do not add bolded delete !votes on your on own Afd. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Struck duplicate !vote from nominator; the nomination is considered as your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. North America1000 01:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: the article mentions that the topic forms part of a raga – I don't know enough about the topic to say for certain, but would it make sense to include it as part of that article? Richard3120 (talk) 04:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * See my comment at Articles for deletion/Jor (music). --Deskford (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:GNG. One just needs to dig deep into sources. Majority are supposed to exist in print media. See this one. Anup   [Talk]  19:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.