Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viljar Veebel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 19:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Viljar Veebel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

More or less unsourced vanity BLP, with only one or two authors (possibly the subject himself). Fails to meet WP:ACADEMIC notability guidelines. Sander Säde 07:51, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:00, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Tiny cites on GS fails WP:Prof. Far too early. What a misguided article. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fails WP:NOTLINKEDIN DCB1927 (talk) 00:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Horrible non-encyclopedic CV-like article. NOTLINKEDIN, precisely! --Randykitty (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication this person comes anywhere being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.