Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villa Enterprises


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Villa Enterprises

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not seem to meet WP:CORP. The article links to a couple of fairly trivial mentions in trade magazines, and the rest of the references are just press releases. A google search turns up no additional sources. Article has a single editor with a likely conflict of interest. L. Pistachio (talk) 07:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete - Corporate advert piece; fails WP:CORP. The bit about the middle east could be notable if not for the fact that it's been done before by McDonald's and the like. § FreeRangeFrog 18:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite - there are a couple of reasonable references (Reuters, Entrepreneur, and American Executive magazine) in there which indicate that this company is notable. As written, the article is little more than promotional.  Once rewritten, it stands a chance of being a reasonable, notable article.--Rtphokie (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Atrociously written article about the corporate owner of a number of chain restaurants, consumer businesses likely to receive some notice in general interest reliable sources. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite to address style and advert. Tried voting to delete such many times... and am resigned to the fact that such are acceptable on wiki if properly formatted... and there are countless other such about corporate entities that have easily brought within guideline. So, let's get it done.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, seems to be notable. Stifle (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.