Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Village Acadian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  17:44, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Village Acadian

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not really a neighborhood, but a single housing subdivision consisting of a single looping street and less than 30 buildings. Not important enough to even be a redirect to Slidell, Louisiana or section of that article. TransporterMan ( TALK ) 18:00, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  —  Baseball   Watcher  19:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I have to agree with nom. Neighboorhoods generally are not notable.  Article doesn't even assert or attempt any sort of notability.--v/r - TP 00:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete We almost never keep this without firm evidence, which is not present. sometimes it can be difficult to tell a true neighborhood from a mere housing tract, but this one is definitely not a true neighborhood.   DGG ( talk ) 04:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.