Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinagre Portillo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. To Callelinea- Bring the article to deletion review after you find references in your trip to Cuba (but even then, the subject might not have sufficient notability). Sr13 03:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Vinagre Portillo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable vinegar factory owned by a person who is also not notable but is related to people who are noted. Corvus cornix 23:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "The second largest" vinegar factory in Cuba at the time and now torn down. I don't know where to begin. --Daniel J. Leivick 23:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, baised I created the article. And hoped to expand on it when I returned from my trip to Cuba (August 10-31, 2007). It was the second largest Vinager company in Cuba and the largest in Havana. I find it interesting and a coinsidence that about 6 articles that I created are now up for AfD all nominated by the same person. Callelinea 03:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I see no notability, not even a hint 74.242.184.198 04:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: interesting that the only contribution 74.242.184.198 has done is to vote on my six articles up for AfD.. Like I have stated something fishy is going on.Callelinea 04:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, I found nothing substantiating the notability of this company in Google Books or Google News Archive. Obviously an historical company in a non-English-speaking country that has undergone revolution and trade embargo and whatnot is going to be a difficult proposition and if verifiable print sources could substantiate the importance of this company that would be a different story. --Dhartung | Talk 10:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That is the reason I am goig to Cuba in August to find out more info on the subjects. Callelinea 12:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment: more info and references added. Callelinea 20:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, this appears to be part of a vanity series based on personal genealogy rather than notability. Abtract 13:42, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, does not meet the guidelines for notability. ++Arx Fortis 13:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced. Rklawton 14:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no refs. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree per nomination reasons.--Dali-Llama 16:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-noteworthy. Nightscream 16:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I would be on the fence about it's notabality but without sources... -- St.daniel Talk 11:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - we should keep this article. It's not exactly "United Fruit Co" or "Bacardi", but it's notable enough as a part of pre-revolutionary Cuban industry. It can always be sourced later. At the very least this article could be incorporated into some kind of list or other article on pre-revolutionary Cuban industry, manufacturing, etc. takethemud 19:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this stay, if verifiable sources as to the company's notability can be found. In there absence then delete. Bigdaddy1981 23:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 14:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.