Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinayak Nath (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 08:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Vinayak Nath
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article reads more like a resume than an encyclopedia article and contains sources that mention the subject in passing. This article was previously deleted through AFD for lacking WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS and I still can't see any sources that address the subject directly and in detail. Fails WP:GNG. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep The TEDx speaking is what puts it in keep category for me. Peter303x (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: See Sockpuppet investigations/Pooja Shree Gaur
 * Keep wrongly nominated for deletion. checked all information he is the national jury in Govt if India and state mentor in Govt of Uttar Pradesh. all references are given already. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CM2021 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Struck disruptive edit, see Sockpuppet investigations/Pooja Shree Gaur.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete From what I can tell, individual's claim to notability is membership on a jury for a minor Indian government program. The other claim, that he has spoken at a TEDx event is not inherently notable, as they can be hosted by anyone who gets a free license from TED, and thus anybody can be invited. Fails GNG IMHO. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with BrxBrx ) 01:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Unfortunately, I was tricked into closing this as a close by the nominator after a disruptive editor placed a misleading message  closing the discussion as withdrawn. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with BrxBrx ) 01:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Keep I just saw this notice ... what I noticed that editors claim deletion because they dont consider him  on any one point  that he is notible .. but this person who is holding multiple roles at one time which is worth to keep this page. having multiple roles in govt and corporate organization at same time is enough to prove notibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:6007:10C2:B04B:B1E7:6740:D082 (talk) 12:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - None of the sources offer significant coverage in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject; failing WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. As BrxBrx points out, TEDx is not the same as a TED Talk. TEDx events are licensed, and anyone can set one up; this is distinct from being invited to give a "TED Talk" at the actual TED conference. No other coverage indicates a GNG pass. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.