Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince's Market


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Vince's Market

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources to indicate that this grocery store is notable William Avery (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as non notable business. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or as an alternative redirect to Atwater Village, Los Angeles, did not find significant coverage in multiple non-primary reliable sources. Subject has been mentioned in reliable source(s) but none of them give in depth information of subject. Therefore, although it has been around for over 50 years, and may be locally significant, it is not yet notable enough for the subject the be independently notable. Now if someone argues that the subject is locally notable, than a redirect to the community it is in is an option, but I am not convinced that it is notably locally at this time, and am willing to read reasoning towards that alternate outcome.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only source I could find was the one I put into the article and a capsule review in the LA Weekly. Neither had any substantial discussion of the place.  I don't think it's even worth a redirect.&mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:29, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 20:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.