Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Orlando


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  « l | Ψrometheăn ™ | l »   (talk) 13:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Vince Orlando

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable actor/screenwriter. Declined speedy. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect with Life Goes On (film), since as far as I can tell, that's the only notable work? Symplectic Map (talk) 01:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * What about "Cut, Print"? - Mgm|(talk) 08:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Life Goes On per Juliancolton, I don't see anything to merge really. Drawn Some (talk) 03:22, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think there's enough out there to go on for notability. Bearian (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Am currently away from my own computer resources, but will be expanding and sourcing per WP:CLEANUP and WP:POTENTIAL when I get home in a few hours. Did my own cursory search per WP:AFTER, and believe their is enough to make this properly encyclopedic per guideline and properly sourced to meet WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Producing multiple notable creations, makes one notable. Look at the blue links on his Filmography, and what role he played in them.    D r e a m Focus  02:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note A non-admin tried to close this AFD and falsely claimed the consensus was Keep -- I don't know what world he's in, but three keeps vs three delete/redirect votes is in no way a consensus to keep. The rules on nonadmin closures so that they can only be closed for obvious consensus votes, and the Keep votes do not even have the majority, let alone a consensus. DreamGuy (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Correction I believe by looking above it is three "keeps", one "merge and redirect", and one "redirect". As an editor who has voiced one of the ivotes the non admin closer saw, was it wise for you to revert him simply out of disagreement? Note: as an involved editor myself, I did not myself rush to revert your reversion. That is for others... non-involved others. My two cents.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as the person who declined the speedy delete. He has some films that appear notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.