Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Verhei (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 13:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Vince Verhei
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not establish notability in his career as a wrestler or journalist. Previously deleted at Articles for deletion/Vince Verhei Nikki  ♥  311  22:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.   — Nikki  ♥  311  22:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. D.M.N. (talk) 22:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination.--SRX 22:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see what makes him notable. He did not have a notable career as a wrestler, and I don't see what makes him notable as a columnist or his podcast notable.  TJ   Spyke   22:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--there's nothing here that is worth an entry in an encyclopedia. Wait--recreation of a previously deleted article? Doesn't that deserve a piledriver? Drmies (talk) 00:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No. The new version is significantly different from the version that was deleted through AFD (speedies are not included in this criterion). - Mgm|(talk) 09:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No. The new version is significantly different from the version that was deleted through AFD (speedies are not included in this criterion). - Mgm|(talk) 09:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, poorly sourced, has been deleted before with good reason. Dr Rgne (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.