Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent(stalker)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as an attack article that cited zero sources. The images, also now deleted, were obvious alterations, and clearly intended to support the attack. (The images were copyright violations that were falsely tagged by the uploader. One was an obvious alteration of an image of Maui Taylor copyrighted by FHM.) Uncle G 15:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Vincent(stalker)
No assertion of notability. Uncertain as to if he deserves an encyclopedic article or not. SunStar Net 13:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete -- entirely non-notable, unsourced, of little interest except perhaps to the creator. Bubba hotep 13:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- non-notable looks like vanity page might even be a speedy type case. TheRanger 14:17, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete please. Looks like criminal use of Wikipedia for defamation.  Picture looks photoshopped, notice that the two expressions are identical and there is yellow just above the collar and tie. Hu 14:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a hoax, with obvious shopped photos. --Alex (Talk) 14:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete It doesn't qualify for speedy as a hoax, but it is certainly defamation. - b o b b y 14:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.