Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Bauhaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only keep argument is unfortunately not giving any indication as to why the topic might be notable - even if an article is cleaned up, we need the topic to be notable to keep the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Vincent Bauhaus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, The only independent coverage I found is a scathing Mirror article. Kleuske (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete as it stands, though if there's any more like that Mirror article it might be a keep after a substantial rewrite ... - David Gerard (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * 'Speedy Delete and I suppose we'll go to a G4 now that we're here, because this is largely advertising, "he is a charismatic person", "he is passionate", etc. Please keep this at a company website or social media, not here. SwisterTwister   talk  02:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Please don't delete Contents improved, unwanted references removed, a reference from daily mail also added. Please review the article and do let me know if we can make more improvement.Jasline Joy (talk) 08:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- strictly a vanity page; no indications of notability. This WP:PROMO article is not adding value to the encyclopedia at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.