Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Lam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Vincent Lam
Doesn't even come close to passing Notability (people). Deprodded because "EVERYONE in the league knows him.". Ricky81682 (talk) 10:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I just want to note that this article has also been userified at User:Vimlam34. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, the referenced comment says "He's really famous in our football league" without even saying which league. --Thorsten1 10:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment It's probably something to do with Rosary ASA, which is the only connection to him. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Note that Rosary ASA isn't all that notable either, so I'm speedying that article. ColourBurst 05:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per notability. --B.d.mills 10:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity article on school soccer coach. JPD (talk) 11:11, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- JPD (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Scottmsg 20:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. – Elisson • Talk 20:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BlueValour 21:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Angelo 18:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - students eh? Clearly non-notable. SenorKristobbal 23:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Subsequent update: please note that I've written up an article on a different Vincent Lam as of October 9. I'm making this note here because one person has already tagged the new article as a CSD G4 on the basis of this AFD; please note therefore that the article now present at the title Vincent Lam is not the person or the article that was discussed in this AFD. Bearcat 17:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.