Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Palmer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't see a further relist achieving a different outcome. Star  Mississippi  02:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Vincent Palmer

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Is Palmer notable enough to warrant an article about him? I don’t think so.--FriendlyFerret9854 (talk) 09:25, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous WP:PROD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:32, 2 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  18:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 10:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Although there was some publicity around the search for this person and his inclusion in a then-unusual online most-wanted list, the question of whether an article is appropriate would have to meet the conditions at WP:PERP #2, and I am not seeing evidence of the required sustained coverage. AllyD (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.