Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincenzo Langella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; !votes by new participants are discounted due to their unfamiliarity with Wikipedia standards for inclusion. bd2412 T 13:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Vincenzo Langella

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable, many sources don't resolve or are over-represented as articles when they are simply Instagram or blog posts CelenaSkaggs (talk) 12:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I went through each and every one of those links and all I can is that the sourcing is atrocious. The subject is not even mentioned by name in any of the legitimate, non-blog publications. WP:GNG, WP:BLOGS, WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK, at least. RetiredDuke (talk) 13:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Mentioned by name by GQ http://gq.co.za/2016/05/6-stylish-men-follow-instagram/


 * Retain There are a lot of articles in non-blog publications — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.12.53.166 (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment 78.12.53.166's Comment is unfounded. Same IP removed the AfD from the page, and removed link to Italy-related discussion page. Furthermore, IP resolves to same location as the subject of the article. Likely conflict of interest; reinstated links - do not remove the AfD until the debate is complete! CelenaSkaggs (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Retain The subject is mentioned by name by GQ, I have a copy of GQ march issue with a full page of him. I see Vincenzo Langella also in many TV 151.41.120.224 (talk) 06:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Please provide references. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 15:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Mentioned by name by GQ http://gq.co.za/2016/05/6-stylish-men-follow-instagram/


 * Retain I think he is vivp very important virtual person. By now there are people that have virtual relevance. 91.252.25.24 (talk) 14:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Please provide references. CelenaSkaggs (talk) 15:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Mentioned by name by GQ http://gq.co.za/2016/05/6-stylish-men-follow-instagram/


 * Delete as per RetiredDuke. I haven't gone through all the references, but the article is clearly promotional and describes no claims of notability. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 07:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Retain There are a lot of reliable sources213.233.18.94 (talk) 19:15, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of enough RS to meet the WP:GNG or any relevant SNGs. The GQ source spammed by all the IPs here is only a passing mention and insufficient to prove notability. Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.