Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vingtaine de Longueville (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Procedural Keep as the nomination has been withdrawn and no one has supported deleting this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Vingtaine de Longueville
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article fails WP:GNG It is a real place but has no signifigant coverage to deem it notable. The source is the same for all the vingtaine articles on the Vingtaine page. If you look their, look at the sources and they are all the same. These articles had no thought put into them. IT passes WP:GEOLAND though, since it is a vingtaine but I couldnt find anything about this vingtaine on google.

I want to withdraw from my nomintation after debated it and said why it is notable. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 22:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Jersey and Islands.  `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 22:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Hello again . Not being able to find information about a topic on Google doesn't automatically make it non-notable. Please read WP:GOOGLEHITS, which explains why "there are no hits on Google" is not a good argument to make in a deletion discussion. WP:GEOLAND says that "populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable". Presumption means that the article doesn't have to show that there are sources in order not to be deleted - we presume that there are some out there, in the absence of immediate evidence. It is OK that the person that created the article didn't add more to it - see WP:NOTIMELIMIT for an explanation why we don't delete articles that have potential to be expanded, even if they are unsourced or poorly sourced. Nor does it matter that a number of the articles about vingtaines use the same source as a reference - a microfiche in a public library. Offline sources are just as valid as online ones, and WP:RSC says it doesn't matter if a reader would need to fly to Jersey and go to the Jersey Archive to look at the microfiche. Jersey Archive is a reliable source for information about the history of places in Jersey. In these type of articles, it is much better to use an appropriate tag to encourage readers to improve the article than to nominate it for deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * comment, good point is their any way I can withdraw my deletion request? I think it would be good to expand and add to all the articles in the Category:Vingtaines of Jersey  `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 07:53, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:WITHDRAWN. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:07, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.